🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries