🔗 Share this article

Based on a new analysis, numerous of personnel having experience in the petroleum sector have been appointed within the existing leadership, comprising above 40 who earlier worked personally for coal corporations.

Overview of the Analysis

This report investigated the profiles of candidates and officials serving in the White House and several government departments handling environmental regulation. These encompass important entities such as the environmental agency, the interior agency, and the Department of Energy.

Larger Policy Environment

The report surfaces amid persistent initiatives to weaken energy regulations and renewable energy programs. For instance, recent bills have released extensive sections of federal property for drilling and eliminated backing for clean sources.

Amid the flood of bad developments that have happened on the ecological front... it’s crucial to remind the public that these are not just measures from the amorphous, massive thing that is the leadership generally, said one author engaged in the study. They are frequently individual players with ties to particular wealthy interests that are carrying out this disastrous anti-regulatory program.

Major Results

Researchers identified 111 staff whom they deemed as industry insiders and alternative energy adversaries. This covers 43 officials who were previously working by coal enterprises. Among them are high-profile leading officials including the top energy official, who formerly acted as CEO of a hydraulic fracturing company.

This list additionally includes less prominent administration members. As an illustration, the office responsible for clean technology is managed by a ex- oil executive. In the same vein, a senior policy advisor in the executive office has served in high-ranking positions at large energy firms.

Further Ties

A further 12 appointees were found to have connections to energy-financed rightwing policy organizations. These cover former employees and researchers of organizations that have strongly opposed alternative sources and promoted the use of conventional sources.

A total of 29 further staff are ex- corporate leaders from polluting sectors whose business interests are closely tied to oil and gas. Additional personnel have relationships with energy providers that distribute conventional power or government leaders who have advocated pro-gas agendas.

Agency Focus

Analysts found that 32 personnel at the Department of the Interior by themselves have ties to extractive energy, establishing it as the highest affected government agency. That encompasses the leader of the department, who has consistently received oil donations and acted as a bridge between energy business donors and the government.

Campaign Contributions

Fossil fuel supporters donated substantial resources to the campaign operation and swearing-in. Since assuming power, the government has not only established industry-friendly rules but also created incentives and exceptions that benefit the sector.

Qualifications Questions

Besides oil-tied appointees, the authors identified a number of government officials who were appointed to key positions with minimal or no subject matter knowledge.

Those officials may not be linked to fossil fuels so explicitly, but their unfamiliarity is problematic, stated one researcher. It’s plausible to think they will be compliant, or easy marks, for the fossil fuel plans.

As an example, the candidate to lead the environmental agency’s office of general counsel has limited litigation experience, having never handled a legal matter to completion, not conducted a deposition, and nor argued a motion.

During an additional case, a White House aide dealing on energy policy arrived to the role after serving in jobs unrelated to the industry, with no clear relevant field or regulatory background.

Administration Response

One representative for the White House dismissed the findings, saying that the administration’s appointees are extremely qualified to deliver on the public’s mandate to expand national fuel development.

Previous and Present Backdrop

The administration oversaw a substantial number of pro-industry steps during its previous term. In its present period, equipped with conservative blueprints, it has spearheaded a considerably more extensive and more aggressive crackdown on environmental policies and alternative sources.

There is no embarrassment, stated a analyst. The administration is proud and ready to go out there and publicize the fact that they are performing benefits for the oil and gas sector, resource field, the energy business.